ADOBE DNG CONVERTER HELP FULL

There was no warning about this problem - but perhaps it's too much to expect there to be a warning - It might be interesting to go back to the X100 RAW files and see if there is the same issue. I can't really figure out whether it's Adobe's DNGs, or Apple's DNG support (and many other applications I might say), or Fuji's RAW format which is the culprit, and unlike Godfrey I don't have a maths degree. But in this case, despite appearances, it doesn't work. I'm perfectly happy to use Lightroom as a DNG interim when Apple are too slow to support cameras. On the other hand, I could just stick to Aperture, because it has the better organisation, the better printing and the better clone tool. I could also succumb, and just move over to LR and photoshop and abandon Aperture. Of course, I could succumb to film, as Robert and Keith suggest - but I've already tried that.

ADOBE DNG CONVERTER HELP FULL

beyond the fact that, of my applications, they are the only ones which will read the full resolution. First of all, Godfrey - I completely understand now - My point 2 was wrong - there isn't anything wrong with the DNG files created by LR4 or Adobe digital converter. I now suspect that it's this interpolated scaling business, from the complex sensor that Fuji has created, that my eye was being sensitive to.Ĭlick to expand.Well, I'm going to answer all of you at once.

one felt slightly stretched in the horizontal dimension compared to the other. I had also noticed that the original JPEGs and the output from Lightroom had slightly different feel. When I was evaluating the X10, I didn't like the way the processed RAF files or JPEGs out of the camera looked for some reason but I couldn't put my finger on it. = DSCF1257-4.jpg :: generated by Lr4 from. = DSCF1257-3.jpg :: generated by Ap3 from. = DSCF1257-2.jpg :: generated by Lr4 from. = DSCF1257-test.dng :: generated by DNG Converter v6.6 Terminal> exiftool -RawImageFullSize -RawImageWidth -RawImageHeight -ImageSize -ImageWidth -ImageHeight > exif.txt Output below from current version EXIFtool using command line: As a result, you get the smaller sizing as seen in the outputs from EXIFtool, it's not doing any of the scaling and other processing that the Fuji X10 image files need to hit the published marks in pixel dimensions. However, the raw image sizings are NOT 3000x4000, they're are somewhat less as you see in the data.Īpple's raw converter, used by Aperture, iPhoto and Preview, doesn't support the Fuji X10 and so does not interpret the scaling factors-even in the DNG files. There are other bits in the EXIF metadata (both the RAF and DNG forms) which indicate this scaling factor. What I find is that Adobe's support of the X10 includes the intepolation intended by Fuji to accommodate their unusual sensor's layout to derive the 3000x4000 pixel image dimensions as advertised. After that, I used EXIFtool to extract the image size dimensions from each. dngs into Lr4 and exported original resolution JPEGs (the -4 files) from both. dngs into Aperture 3 and exported original resolution JPEGs (the -3 files) from both. Next, I imported both RAF files into Lr4 and exported original resolution JPEGs (the -2 files) from both. RAF/.JPG pair from the X10 of my own and generated a test DNG. I took your files and generated a -test DNG myself. You're not seeing things and things are not what they appear.

Adobe dng converter help